Extreme-Scale, Nano & Fundamental Engineering
/Individual contributor at the frontier
Senior Computational Astrophysicist
Several simulation and analysis programmes at once, and the convergence discipline across them.
Compensation
Engagement
Full-Time
Permanent role. Full-time commitment. This is an on-site role at Kolkata. It is not remote and not hybrid.
Scope of role
Own complex problems end-to-end. Set technical direction. Mentor mid and junior teammates.
Research classification
Computing quantities that cannot be obtained in closed form, from established physics. Reproducible calculations, convergence and error budgets, released code and datasets.
Computational research. Computed from established physics. A computed number is a prediction, and it is only as good as its convergence, its error budget, and whatever data it can be checked against.
Scale range 10^13 m to 10^100 m
Nothing at this scale is engineered and nothing is experimented on. The observable universe has a radius of roughly 10^26 m; everything beyond that is a property of a cosmological model rather than an observation, and this division says so every time it publishes a figure that extends past it. Simulation output is a model realisation, not data, and is labelled as such in every figure it appears in. Scientific integrity is a condition of every role in this department. Assumptions are stated separately from conclusions. Uncertainty is reported. Negative and inconclusive results are written up, not discarded. Speculative work is labelled speculative, including when that makes it less impressive. Fabrication, falsification, and presenting a simulation as a measurement end an engagement here.
Scale bands are a research classification, not a claim of experimental reach. Most of this span cannot be probed by any apparatus that exists: nothing below about 10^-19 m has been measured directly, and anything at 10^26 m or beyond is inferred from observation rather than engineered. Every opportunity states the kind of work it actually is.
01 — The role
Why this role exists at EduRankAI
Department of Extreme-Scale, Nano & Fundamental Engineering, Division D15: Astrophysics, Cosmology & Extreme-Scale Modelling. This division analyses observational and public datasets, develops cosmological models, runs simulations, quantifies uncertainty, and compares models against observations. It distinguishes evidence, inference and speculation in every result, because at this scale those three are easy to confuse and expensive to confuse. This position: Several simulation and analysis programmes at once, and the convergence discipline across them. Scale range for this work: 10^13 m to 10^100 m. Research classification: Computational. Computing quantities that cannot be obtained in closed form, from established physics. Evidential standing: Computational research. Computed from established physics. A computed number is a prediction, and it is only as good as its convergence, its error budget, and whatever data it can be checked against. Nothing at this scale is engineered and nothing is experimented on. The observable universe has a radius of roughly 10^26 m; everything beyond that is a property of a cosmological model rather than an observation, and this division says so every time it publishes a figure that extends past it. Simulation output is a model realisation, not data, and is labelled as such in every figure it appears in. Scale bands are a research classification, not a claim of experimental reach. Most of this span cannot be probed by any apparatus that exists: nothing below about 10^-19 m has been measured directly, and anything at 10^26 m or beyond is inferred from observation rather than engineered. Every opportunity states the kind of work it actually is. Level 5 (Senior). Several related problems at once, and the technical judgement of less experienced colleagues.
02 — The work
What you will own
- 01 Analyse observational and public datasets, with the selection function addressed rather than ignored.
- 02 Develop cosmological and astrophysical models and state what each one assumes.
- 03 Run simulations at the scale the question requires, with resolution convergence tested.
- 04 Quantify uncertainty, including the systematic uncertainty that dominates at this scale.
- 05 Compare models against observations and report the comparisons that went badly.
- 06 Separate evidence, inference and speculation explicitly in every written result.
- 07 Carry several related problems at once without losing the thread of any of them.
- 08 Raise the technical judgement of less experienced colleagues, in review and in person.
03 — The expertise
What we look for
04 — The bar
Who thrives here
- → Education: Doctorate or an equivalent research record.
- → Experience: 6 to 10 years, including work that other people have built on.
- → Scope of the role: Several related problems at once, and the technical judgement of less experienced colleagues.
- → Must have: Can explain what a redshift measures and what has to be assumed to turn it into a distance. Also: Has analysed a real astronomical dataset, including its selection function.
- → Portfolio: at least one piece of work — code, a written result, a thesis chapter, a preprint — that somebody outside your institution can read and assess. It does not need to be published.
Terms of Engagement
How working time works at this level
No counted hours. A five-day week with a four-hour overlap window so colleagues can reach you, and objectives agreed for the cycle.
Type
Senior
Working days
5 per week
Rest days
2 per week
Hours counted
No
Daily overlap
4h
Measured by
Objectives agreed for the cycle, the quality of the judgement calls, and the people the work makes better. Not attendance.
Where this stands legally
Hours are not counted at this level. The statutory ceiling of 9 hours a day and 48 a week remains the limit the role is designed to fit inside: if the work cannot be done within a normal week, the scope is wrong, not the person.
The full per-level model is published at Working Hours by Level.
05 — Hiring process
What to expect after you apply
- 01
Application review
Every application is read personally within five business days. We respond either way.
- 02
Take-home or live exercise
Role-specific. Time-boxed. Real problems we are actually working on, not invented puzzles.
- 03
Conversations
Deep technical and values conversations with the team you would join. No trick questions. No panel ambushes.
- 04
Offer or honest no
If yes: digital offer letter, signed in-portal, transparent terms. If no: written feedback if you want it.
The standard
What you deliver, and how it is judged
Deliverables
- Analyses with the selection function and systematics documented.
- Simulations with resolution convergence tested and the initial conditions recorded.
- Posterior distributions with convergence diagnostics, not point estimates.
- Written results in which evidence, inference and speculation are separately labelled.
Evaluation criteria
- Whether the selection function was handled.
- Whether resolution convergence was demonstrated.
- Whether systematic uncertainty is included rather than only statistical.
- Whether speculation is labelled as speculation, particularly where it is the interesting part.
Preferred, not required
Nothing in this list is a bar to applying.
Tools you would work in
Reports to: Astrophysics, Cosmology & Extreme-Scale Modelling Lead
Works with: D01, D02, D08, D09, D14
Before you start
What we will collect. What it costs. What we will not do with it.
We will collect
- Name, email, phone — Account + application updates. No marketing.
- Resume / portfolio link — Human review of your work.
- Date + place of birth — Identity verification only.
- Your written responses — Selection rubric. Read by humans.
- Government ID (later) — Anti-fraud at offer / interview stage. Not at signup.
We will never
- Sell your data
- Share with third-party recruiters
- Use for advertising
- Train models on it
- Send marketing email
Our situation
EduRankAI is a small, independent organization building long-term capabilities in educational intelligence, advanced AI systems, and research infrastructure. We take no advertiser money, no donations with strings attached, and no investor pressure on hiring decisions. Applying is free, and every application is read by a human — recruitment, technical, academic and leadership teams. It buys us the right to be honest.
Ready to apply?
We read every application personally. If you are the right person for this role — regardless of pedigree, background, or where you are based — you will hear back from us within five business days.
Apply through this page. You will be asked for your education, your experience, and links to work we can actually read — a repository, a write-up, a thesis chapter, a preprint. Send the piece of work you would defend, not the one with the best title. If a result in it turned out to be wrong, say so; we would rather read that than not know. Every application is read by a person. We assess applications on evidence of the work. We do not filter on institution, on age, on gender, on caste, on religion, on disability, or on where you are from. If any part of this process is inaccessible to you, tell us and we will change it for you.
Other roles in Extreme-Scale, Nano & Fundamental Engineering
Explore related openings
Senior Full-Time